Regional governance timeline

Engineer L. Alfred Jenny proposed a loop rapid-transit line from the Hackensack Meadows under the Hudson to about 57th Street, down Manhattan, and back through Jersey City, with transfer stations wherever it crossed a New Jersey railroad. The New York–New Jersey Port and Harbor Development Commission turned it down. Jenny kept offering variations for 30 years.

The Legislature set up the commission to study the transit problem. It took a traffic census in 1924 and warned in its 1926 report that New Jersey “must give immediate and thoughtful consideration to the transit problem.”

The North Jersey Transit Commission published an engineering plan for a loop rapid-transit system connecting Manhattan with the North Jersey railroads.

The Port of New York Authority and the North Jersey Transit Commission organized the board with railroad officials and the Westchester Planning Committee to coordinate plans for an area-wide solution.

After spending more than $220,000 on studies, the board produced another loop plan but adopted no program, and disbanded. The North Jersey Transit Commission ended the same year with a warning that the highway projects under way would not meet all the area’s needs.

The association’s 1935 report said: “Motor vehicles cannot supplant rail facilities as a means of commuter transportation between New Jersey and Manhattan.” The North Jersey Transit Committee, formed the same year, backed a transit plan by consulting engineer L. Alfred Jenny of Dumont.

Valentine Christian proposed a 37½-mile open-cut railroad from Mahwah to the George Washington Bridge and across its lower level. The proposed system was estimated at $41 million and became one of the unbuilt alternatives later recalled in debates over a regional commuter network.

The Bergen County Rapid Transit Association proposed a subway from Paterson along Route 4, across the George Washington Bridge and downtown via the Ninth Avenue elevated. Its $40–50 million plan included feeder connections from the Susquehanna and West Shore railroads and north–south buses.

Ordered in 1936 to make a new study, the Port Authority proposed a suburban rapid transit system for northern New Jersey that carried the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad from 33rd Street to 51st Street and across to New Jersey through a new tunnel. Its report said good rapid transit could add millions of dollars in property values. The New Jersey Legislature directed another study; in 1939 the Authority asked for more time, “and nothing more was heard of the proposal.”

Two articles date the plan to 1937; The Jersey Journal’s 1966 account gives 1938.

New Jersey legislators considered a bill to create a railroad authority. The proposal died when the Legislature adjourned.

Governor Alfred E. Driscoll suggested that commuter railroads share a terminal in the Hackensack meadows where riders could transfer to a rapid-transit line into Manhattan.

The New Jersey Legislature established the Regional Planning Commission, headed by Senator David Van Alstyne. Its work developed a regional approach to the metropolitan rail problem and preceded the separate New York and New Jersey rapid-transit commissions created in 1952.

After two years studying commuter transportation, the Regional Plan Association recommended a special interstate commission to examine the regional transportation system as a whole. President Paul Windels later presented that proposal as the basis for a fresh approach to rail investment and Manhattan congestion.

The New Jersey Regional Planning Commission, headed by State Senator David Van Alstyne of Englewood, recommended that a metropolitan rapid transit authority be created and report to the 1953 Legislature. Its report also recommended a new rail tunnel connecting North Jersey with Manhattan at about Forty-fifth Street.

Senator David Van Alstyne introduced a metropolitan rapid-transit commission bill in New Jersey on February 11; Senator Greenberg of Brooklyn introduced its counterpart in New York on February 21. The Regional Plan Association endorsed the two bills on March 3, arguing that rail improvements were essential to relieving road congestion.

Governor Driscoll appointed the commission’s members, among them Senator Van Alstyne. The legislation creating it provided $50,000 for studies of transit improvements. New York had set up a separate commission of its own.

Goodhue Livingston Jr. criticized the New York commission for “dragging its feet” and said it had been stymied by Governor Dewey. The commission’s vice chairman acknowledged that no staff had been hired; New York had given its commission $10,000 and New Jersey $20,000.

Hearings before the New York Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission, with New Jersey’s commission sitting in, renewed interest in seeing the region’s mass transportation needs whole. A subsequent New York Times editorial called the question of subsidizing commuter railroads the first to decide.

After the separate commissions issued almost identical reports, both Legislatures adopted their recommendation and the New York–New Jersey Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission came into existence, with $50,000 from each state. Its vice chairman dated this to June 1954; a 1955 New York Times editorial gives June 14, 1953.

A memorandum of understanding between the Port Authority and the Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission was made public. The Authority would furnish up to $500,000 for engineers to study rail rapid transit between New Jersey and New York. The memorandum urged a “constitutionally sound, financially practicable and politically feasible plan of meeting deficits.”

Governor Meyner announced he would approve a $150,000 appropriation for the commission. With $150,000 approved by New York and $500,000 available from the Port Authority, the Times wrote, “an inquiry of respectable thoroughness should be possible.” Meyner also named a new set of New Jersey members.

The Monmouth County Planning Board adopted a resolution urging the commission to include the county in its study of New York–New Jersey transit problems, citing its growth in year-round commuter traffic.

Henry K. Norton, chairman of the New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad, presented the commission with a plan for rapid transit lines from the tri-state suburbs running on overhead tracks in New York. Real estate operator William Zeckendorf objected that the city would not stand for another elevated railroad.

Mayor Robert F. Wagner Jr. convened the Metropolitan Regional Conference, later known as the Metropolitan Regional Council. This voluntary association of the top elected officials of the counties and major cities of the tri-state region discussed shared problems such as regional traffic control and water and air pollution. New York City paid most of its $50,000-a-year cost.

The chamber announced it would present its program to the commission on September 10. Three points, including a new East River tunnel at 76th Street, were already in engineering studies the commission had authorized.

John A. Kervick of the commission told the Jersey City Real Estate Board that rail transit everywhere requires some public support, but that the commission expected a proposal costing “no way near the fantastic estimates of a billion and upward.” Co-chairman Charles H. Tuttle warned the same day that only a strong interstate body could keep a transportation policy going.

Paul W. Johnston told the Bergen County Chamber of Commerce that commuter railroads should be paid for unprofitable service as utilities are, with any excess cost spread among the municipalities that benefit. The Record concluded that the choice in rail commuter service “seems to be abandonment or subsidy.”

Project director Arthur W. Page recommended two new Hudson River tunnels, at about Fifty-ninth Street and at the Battery, carrying a rail loop that would connect New Jersey’s commuter lines with Manhattan over BMT subway tracks. A new bi-state district with a 32-member council would run it and assess counties for an estimated $12 million annual deficit.

About 100 county leaders in Teaneck heard the commission’s executive director outline the plan. Bergen’s share of the deficit would be $1.84 million a year, the largest of any county. Formal hearings were set to begin June 18 in Newark.

Representative Frank C. Osmers Jr. proposed an alternative to building new Hudson tunnels: use Hudson & Manhattan’s tubes, the planned George Washington Bridge lower deck and, if necessary, a Lincoln Tunnel tube. The tentative proposal sought economies in a regional loop, but confronted capacity limits and prior commitments of the road crossings to motor traffic.

The Interstate Commerce Commission granted requests to discontinue Hudson River ferry lines used by riders on three railroads serving Bergen County. A federal court order kept the ferries going pending a final decision.

The commission opened hearings in Newark on what The Record called “the nineteenth New York area transportation survey since the early 1920s,” moving to New York on September 17. Critics, including Representative Frank C. Osmers Jr. and engineer L. Alfred Jenny, pressed lower-cost alternatives.

At the Arden House conference on metropolitan problems, Robert Moses said that if any agency was needed to unify rapid transit it should be the Port Authority, and called the railroads “a busted, lazy and backward private enterprise.” The Port Authority’s executive director rejected the idea at once, saying transit would wreck the Authority’s credit.

The panel included the chairman of the New York City Transit Authority, the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad’s trustee, and the president of the Central Railroad of New Jersey. Morris Pesin of the Jersey City Merchants Council planned to ask “what Jersey is going to get out of it.”

State Senator Walter H. Jones of Bergen County pledged to support a workable program after the commission’s final report, but hoped it would not carry “a $12 million deficit millstone around its neck.”

The commission’s modified plan dropped the BMT tracks for a new subway up Fifth and Madison Avenues and routed the line through Journal Square, raising the cost by $100 million and the annual deficit to $14.5 million. Critics called it “disappointing,” “wasteful,” and “monstrous.” New York’s attorney general said a constitutional amendment might be needed.

The Transportation Act of 1958 expanded the Interstate Commerce Commission’s authority over railroad passenger-service discontinuances. The Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission warned that reliance on state regulators and courts could no longer assure continued commuter operations, while Senator Clifford P. Case later called for an investigation of the drive to abandon services.

After three years and more than $1 million of study, the commission recommended a $500 million loop and, as its one legislative proposal, a bi-state transit district to plan and negotiate a system. It concluded that a coordinated, modernized system of transit by rail and bus between New York and New Jersey was essential.

Two reports are dated January 1959. Articles from February, November, and December 1958 describe the final report as already delivered, supporting a January 1958 date.

Senator Walter H. Jones introduced a bill to create a Metropolitan Transit District with a 32-member council, 16 from each state, and $150,000 a year from each state for five years. An identical bill was introduced in the New York Legislature the same day. Any plan would need approval from both Legislatures.

The Senate passed the Jones bill, S-50. Opponents later said the necessary eleventh vote came from Senator Sido Ridolfi of Mercer County, and that seven of the eleven senators in favor represented counties that would bear none of the deficit.

Herman T. Stichman, trustee of the bankrupt Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, told a Bergen County group that the Port Authority “has never concerned itself with the rail transportation problems of the metropolitan area.” He said connecting Erie and Susquehanna trains to the tubes and subways could be done for less than $100,000,000.

In a letter to the Governor and Legislature, the commission said the transit district act “does one thing only—it creates a public agency, based on local representation, to develop and to negotiate such a public plan.” The Herald News noted that Congress had since given the Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction over railroad passenger service, and the ICC was letting railroads curtail it.

Lyle C. Fitch, First Deputy City Administrator, told the National Tax Association that the only clear benefit of the half-billion-dollar loop would be to its users, who should pay the entire bill. He called transportation “a region-wide problem” needing coordination of agencies and pooled revenues. He spoke for himself, not the city administration.

The Jersey City Commission adopted a resolution opposing the bill. Morris Pesin of the Jersey City Merchants Council called the loop “a noose around the neck of Jersey City” and urged the Assembly to compel the Port Authority to connect New Jersey’s railroads to the Hudson & Manhattan tubes instead.

Frank H. Simon told the Hackensack Area Development Association that “you and I will not in our lifetimes see them take on rapid transit projects.” He called a comprehensive regional agency the desirable ultimate, but said anyone attempting it “would be like Don Quixote attacking the windmill.”

Port Authority executive director Austin J. Tobin argued for more than two hours that the Authority could not spend on transit and submitted a 46-page memorandum. The Assembly’s economist, Dr. Salomon J. Flink, countered in a 57-page report that the Authority could set aside earnings to cover part of a transit deficit. The commission’s co-chairmen asked for action; the Regional Council asked for a tri-state approach.

About 20 people attended a Newark hearing on how to tackle metropolitan problems; Newark was the only New Jersey municipality to send an official. The council, elected officials who had met informally for more than two years, was weighing whether to seek formal status, and a committee under Columbia’s Wallace Sayre was to report on January 13.

After two public hearings the bill was rewritten as a ten-member agency appointed by the two governors, with any property tax for deficits expressly barred. It reached the floor but lacked the votes. The Lehigh Valley and the Lackawanna then said they would seek to abandon most of their passenger services.

Jersey City Mayor Witkowski, who had led the council’s opposition to the district, called its traffic and transportation committee together: “Having played a large role in the defeat of the transit district, I feel it is up to the regional council to offer constructive plans.” Senator Clifford P. Case called for a Senate investigation of efforts to rid railroads of commuter service.

A Regional Plan Association committee of eight headed by Columbia’s Wallace S. Sayre urged that the voluntary council be established by identical statutes in the three states and a compact approved by Congress, with a small full-time secretariat. “The present mass transportation crisis,” it said, “is but a foretaste of the difficulties which will soon and increasingly press upon the region.”

With the commission preparing to go out of business, the Port Authority opposed, and the counties unwilling to be taxed, Senator Wesley L. Lance proposed a state Division of Railroad Transportation to act as a “catalyst agent.” He said the Port Authority should underwrite part of any deficit: “When we speak of rapid transit, we are speaking about a deficit operation.”

Governors Rockefeller, Meyner, and Ribicoff held a transit conference and heard railroads, labor, communities, and the Port Authority. Senator Walter H. Jones called it “a black day for New Jersey commuters and for the growth of regional concepts,” saying the governors of New York and Connecticut had washed their hands of the commuter problem.

The Senate passed the Assembly’s bi-state transit district bill 12 to 1, with most abstainers calling it futile, and the Assembly voted 53 to 3 for a State Division of Railroad Transportation in the Highway Department. The district bill could not become law unless New York enacted identical legislation. A bill to hand the problem to the Port Authority stayed in committee. In Albany the Senate voted 56 to 1 for an Office of Transportation in the governor’s executive department.

Governor Meyner signed the bill setting up a bi-state rapid transit agency. Two weeks later New York passed a different version, and New Jersey had to amend its law to match.

Asked by Senator Lance whether the Authority might help pay for a connection between the Jersey Central and the Hudson & Manhattan, estimated at $15 to $40 million, Austin J. Tobin replied that it was legally impossible to contribute from present revenues or reserves.

The Plainfield Common Council voted unanimously for the resolution despite a letter from Tobin warning that involvement in the rail crisis “could well lead to the destruction of the Port Authority as a useful agent.” The sponsor answered that “the Port Authority was created to do this job.”

By 39 to 15 the Assembly approved a New York–New Jersey Transportation Agency with one member from each state and $25,000 from each, and by 36 to 16 let the Port Authority borrow $20 million from New York State to buy coaches for lease to three New York railroads. Opponents said the car program was meant to preclude a larger Port Authority role. Assemblyman Musto asked who Austin Tobin was “to tell us they can’t do it,” adding: “We created the Port Authority.”

Governor Meyner and Highway Commissioner Dwight R. G. Palmer were cool to the Regional Plan Association’s proposal for a three-year study of metropolitan transportation. “There are so many agencies now, I would like to see some of them start producing before we hire any more,” Palmer said.

The House unanimously passed a resolution granting Congressional consent to the compact. The agency was to prepare an interim and a long-range plan for commuter transportation across the Hudson, with recommendations due in June 1961.

The state’s Division of Rail Transportation proposed using $30 to $40 million in New Jersey Turnpike reserves, and annual sums after that, to help railroads pay their taxes and to lend for modernization. The plan needed approval from the Legislature, the voters, and two-thirds of turnpike bondholders. The Republican state chairman called it “half-baked.”

The Senate gave unanimous consent, adding amendments that required Congressional approval of the agency’s long-range plan and of any change in the compact. The resolution went to President Eisenhower.

In a statewide referendum, New Jersey residents turned down the proposal to divert surplus New Jersey Turnpike Authority revenues to railroad assistance. The state began a railroad subsidy program in 1960.

The Assembly voted 43–10 to extend the Division of Railroad Transportation through 1962 and 51–3 to appropriate $25,000 to the New York–New Jersey Transportation Agency. Both measures went to the Senate. Alfred Beadleston supported the extension while criticizing the division’s secrecy; William Musto argued that the Port Authority should take responsibility for the transit problem.

The association endorsed the Metropolitan Regional Council’s effort, through Mayor Wagner, to establish an agency representing the three states, New York City, and the council. It said the bi-state agency, “while in being is not yet in operation,” could be enlarged or replaced, and urged applying for federal highway planning funds for a comprehensive study.

The Division of Railroad Transportation proposed $6 million a year in state service contracts, consolidation of Shore passenger service under the Pennsylvania Railroad, and rerouting Jersey Central trains through Newark. It asked the Port Authority to buy 90 H&M cars for $8.55 million and lease them to the railroad, while placing H&M under bi-state control. The report opposed handing the Port Authority New Jersey’s entire rail problem; longer-term proposals included extending rapid transit and integrating services.

Colonel S. H. Bingham, a former executive director of the New York City Transit Authority, sent the three governors a plan for a tri-state agency to run a high-speed system built from linked existing lines, at a maximum of $317 million against at least $915 million for an entirely new system. A month later Newsday reported it had been “greeted with silence and apathy.”

Thomas M. Goodfellow told the Municipal Forum of New York that a three-state authority with the power and resources to plan and coordinate all commuter travel was the only solution. “Rail commuter service must be recognized and treated for what it is—a public service,” he said.

The Port Authority agreed to devote up to 10 percent of its general reserve fund annually to commuter-rail improvements under legislation prepared for New York and New Jersey. The proposal marked a departure from its resistance to rail subsidies, but its financial limits soon became a central dispute in the legislation to acquire the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad.

Highway Commissioner Dwight Palmer certified a crisis in travel between New Jersey and New York, a required step before New Jersey’s commuter-income tax took effect. The measure sought to redirect New York income taxes paid by New Jersey residents toward interstate transportation. Palmer proposed using the proceeds for rail and bus support, equipment, reroutings, park-and-ride facilities and related improvements; the plan was already expected to face a constitutional challenge.

The governors of Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey created the Tri-State Transportation Committee as a temporary body to study and act on the region’s transportation problems.

An October 1960 editorial describes earlier agreement on an interstate study committee. The February 1963 report and July 1965 retrospective date creation of the Tri-State Transportation Committee to August 1961.

L. Alfred Jenny presented a Teaneck-commissioned plan connecting North Jersey railroads to a double-tunnel U-shaped route through midtown and downtown Manhattan. Designed for standard railroad equipment, it could carry freight outside rush hours and eventually offer through passenger service as suburban lines were electrified. Jenny argued that the H&M tubes were too small and urged a new bi-state transportation authority rather than assigning the project to the Port Authority.

The two states had the Port Authority take over the bankrupt Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, now PATH, alongside the World Trade Center. The statute included a covenant that further deficit financing of railroad projects would be undertaken only within set financial limits, which the Authority read as 10 percent of its General Reserve Fund.

Dwight Palmer and the Division of Railroad Transportation proposed a $126 million program linking North Jersey’s commuter railroads with a rehabilitated Hudson & Manhattan system. It emphasized existing rights-of-way, electrification, modern equipment, transfer stations and parking rather than extensive new tracks. The plan depended on a Port Authority takeover of H&M and financing from federal, state and railroad sources.

The three governors announced a region-wide passenger-travel study, mailing questionnaires to 500,000 households across the 11,000-square-mile metropolitan area. The survey covered local, work and nonwork trips as well as commuting to Manhattan. Edwards and Kelcey would analyze the results and forecast travel through 1985, with roughly $300,000 supplied by federal and state highway agencies. The work would provide a shared factual base for regional highway and transit planning.

As the council sought formal membership agreements, the Westchester Board of Supervisors voted 26 to 7 against joining and Suffolk also refused. The council’s secretary said “hate literature” was being circulated. Mayor Wagner and Westchester’s county executive defended it as a voluntary agency; the latter said, “If it weren’t for the council, New Haven Railroad probably wouldn’t be operating today.”

Governor Dempsey proposed $1 million in state aid to the bankrupt New Haven railroad, available only if Connecticut’s Legislature approved the Tri-State Transportation Commission compact. New York had approved the compact; Connecticut’s Senate had passed it and its House had sent it to committee. Connecticut would bear 10 percent of administrative costs and the other two states 45 percent each.

In its third interim report, Tri-State described a $256,000 New Brunswick park-and-ride station, a proposed Manhattan–Idlewild rail-and-limousine connection, and a study of express buses on the West Shore railroad right-of-way. The busway proposal would preserve freight tracks and serve Bergen and Rockland passengers through local pickups and express running. The committee also outlined a major household and vehicle travel survey to support long-range planning.

The Inter-Municipal Group for Better Rail Service voted unanimously to revive the Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission’s independent loop proposal. Representing eighteen municipalities along the Jersey Central corridor, the group criticized Highway Commissioner Dwight Palmer’s handling of passenger service and sought direct access to Manhattan through new Hudson tunnels and an uptown–downtown subway. The vote kept the larger loop alternative alive as the state pursued consolidation of existing rail services.

Governor Dempsey signed bills creating the Tri-State Transportation Commission and the Connecticut Transportation Authority, the latter with $1 million for operations and a $2 million bond issue to subsidize or take over New Haven commuter service. New York had approved the compact; New Jersey had not.

A new Pennsylvania Railroad station off Jersey Avenue in New Brunswick opened with parking designed to spare commuters the congested downtown approach. The joint state, railroad and Tri-State demonstration tested whether an accessible suburban station could attract drivers and shift riders from the existing city-center station. By April 1964 it served about 150 commuters, and additional trains were being scheduled.

At the Regional Plan Association’s conference, a survey of 5,600 residents showed nearly two-thirds of those outside the city approving a metropolitan planning agency with limited enforcement powers. The Long Island Rail Road’s president complained that after three years “nothing has been done, but we’re still talking about the same things”; William J. Ronan, the Tri-State committee’s chairman, replied that “a great deal has been done.”

Tri-State announced that six new station parking lots, providing 437 spaces at Brewster, Katonah, Pleasantville, Chappaqua and Hawthorne, had opened. They were an early completed element of its federally supported Harlem Division experiment. The larger North White Plains lot, a pedestrian tunnel and expanded express and local train schedules were still to follow, showing that the demonstration was being implemented in stages.

The Tri-State Transportation Committee had 587 employees and a budget totaling about $8.3 million since 1961, but existed by what one lawmaker called “a gentlemen’s agreement between the governors.” A version amended on February 5 to keep New Jersey out of any New Haven rescue passed in New York; New Jersey’s Senate Republican leaders opposed it, the majority leader warning of a super-agency able to control land use and condemn property.

President Johnson signed Senator Harrison A. Williams’s mass transit bill, providing $375 million over three years for transit equipment on a two-thirds federal basis. In Trenton, Senate Bill 222 for a Tri-State Transportation Compact failed. “I’m not opposed to a Tri-State Commission,” said Assemblyman J. Edward Crabiel. “But I am opposed to an operating one.”

Responding to a Long Island Rail Road fare request, Liberal Party candidate Stanley J. Levy called for public ownership of the railroad and a Tri-State Transportation Authority, “similar to the Port of New York Authority,” to operate the region’s commuter lines and integrate them with the city’s system.

New York created the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority to take responsibility for the Long Island Rail Road and other commuter services. William J. Ronan, Governor Rockefeller’s secretary and chairman of the Tri-State committee, became its chairman. The authority purchased the LIRR from the Pennsylvania Railroad in early 1966, giving the state an operating body alongside the region’s planning commission.

A Bridgeport Post columnist argued that the bankrupt railroad’s plight was part of a larger problem of treating transport as a unit, and that “a Tri-State Transportation Authority for the New York Region makes sense.”

Meeting at Morven in Princeton, Governors Richard Hughes and Nelson Rockefeller agreed to seek a compact largely restricted to planning, with a veto for each governor. The compromise abandoned the operating and condemnation powers that had provoked New Jersey opposition. Separate New York–Connecticut aid for the New Haven Railroad helped reassure New Jersey that a regional planning body would not make it pay for that rescue. Preserving eligibility for federal planning funds was a central reason for the agreement.

In a 12-point memorandum the association recommended that the three states establish a public corporation to maintain, modernize, and consolidate all rail commuter service, with the states bearing current deficits. Its president said any faltering of New Jersey’s railroads “would have several times the effect” of the New Haven’s.

Governor Hughes signed a bill giving the Tri-State Transportation Committee official status, calling the compact “modest though it is in some respects.” The commission could apply for and receive federal planning funds but had no operating, condemnation, or land-use powers. “For once New Jersey is a leader instead of a dragger in regional activity,” The Record wrote.

The railroad announced that unless it was relieved of the financial burden, it would file to abandon commuter service at the end of 1965. Its newest commuter cars dated from the 1930s. “The commuter situation,” a New Jersey rail planner said, “has been studied to death. All it needs is money.”

Signing New York’s act, Governor Rockefeller noted that similar laws had twice been enacted there “only to fail of passage elsewhere,” and that enactment by New Jersey and Connecticut meant “organized transportation planning on a regional basis can go forward.” The commission would survey, plan, and recommend, continuing the work of the governors’ committee.

State Senator Thomas J. Mackell of Queens said he would prefile a bill to consolidate eight state and interstate agencies, among them the Port Authority, the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, and the Tri-State commission, leading to a Tri-State Metropolitan Transportation Authority. It would need passage in all three states.

County Executive Nickerson urged Vice President Humphrey to support a tri-state transportation authority with power to make and enforce decisions. He praised the Tri-State commission as a step forward but said its “limited authority” kept it from putting projects to work.

The compact commission elected William Ronan chairman, named Dwight Palmer and Leo Donohue vice-chairmen, and retained J. Douglas Carroll as executive director. It arranged to take over the former committee’s staff, equipment, surveys and demonstration projects. The organizational transition put the region’s accumulated transportation and land-use research under the statutory commission approved by the three states.

The governors of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut unveiled a 20-year transportation program prepared by the Tri-State Transportation Commission. The proposal combined rail, highway, and bridge improvements and raised the possibility of unified regional operations and financing.

Contemporary accounts disagree on the total: The Record and Newsday reported $10 billion on May 19, while The Star-Ledger’s May 20 editorial described a $20 billion program.

Governor Hughes proposed that the Port Authority study how to hook up the railroads crossing the Meadows, by physical connection or transfer stations. The Jersey Journal recounted 45 years of failed “master plans” and quoted Governor Dempsey on the Tri-State committee’s founding: “Today we are going to appoint a committee to study the study committees.”

William J. Ronan said the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority would study jetport sites at Governor Rockefeller’s request, citing Calverton in Suffolk County and planned 100-mile-per-hour Long Island Rail Road trains. Grumman, which leased the field, opposed its conversion.

In his State of the State message the governor proposed expanding the commuter authority to be “responsible for unified regional policy direction and control of mass transportation in the New York metropolitan region,” taking in the New York City Transit Authority and Robert Moses’s Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority.

After the state’s transportation department warned that the traffic situation “would be hopeless without rail commuter service,” the public approved a $640 million bond issue with $200 million reserved for mass transit. The money went largely to repairs and replacing old rolling stock.

Governors Cahill and Rockefeller established a task force of Austin J. Tobin of the Port Authority, William J. Ronan of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and John C. Kohl, New Jersey’s transportation commissioner.

A reverse-flow bus lane began carrying New Jersey commuters along the 2½-mile I-495 approach to the Lincoln Tunnel. Coordinated by Tri-State and operated by the Port Authority with state and federal support, the demonstration let about 800 buses carrying 35,000 daily riders bypass morning congestion.

After Governor Cahill threatened to veto the Authority’s Kennedy Airport rail link unless it did as much for New Jersey, the commissioners agreed to survey a rail tunnel under the Hudson at Weehawken, and rail access to Newark Airport, and to examine improving and operating Penn Station in Newark.

Tobin told legislators from both states that the Port Authority could not enter mass transit on an unlimited deficit projection. Governor Cahill called it a “negative, defeatist attitude” and told New Jersey’s commissioners he regarded them as “the policy makers.” Theodore W. Kheel sued to void the 1962 covenant; the federal courts dismissed the case. Tobin retired in December.

Tobin, Ronan, and Kohl reported that connecting the Erie lines to the Penn Central at Harrison and Secaucus would give through service to Penn Station “possibly a decade sooner” than a new rail tunnel, but that “the long term needs of trans-Hudson travelers could best be met by a new rail tunnel into mid-Manhattan north of 42nd Street.”

Tri-State approved three contracts totaling $651,000 to improve bus travel between New Jersey and the Port Authority Bus Terminal. The program combined park-and-ride facilities, preferential bus access to Route 3 and equipment intended to identify buses and bill tolls without stopping them, with the Port Authority and New Jersey Turnpike Authority supervising the tolling work.

After a successful one-year trial, the participating agencies agreed to retain the Lincoln Tunnel exclusive bus lane. Tri-State reported that it cut morning journeys by 10 to 25 minutes and attracted an estimated 2,300 additional daily peak-period bus riders; permanent traffic-control equipment was being prepared.

The Department of Transportation presented a master plan with an estimated $3.1 billion in transit improvements, including a Weehawken tunnel to be built “by others.” “We have seen neither a plan nor a program but many projects lumped together,” said the Ridgewood Transportation Committee’s chairman.

Estimates by the Tri-State Regional Planning Commission through 1990 came to $12.2 billion for New York, $2.9 billion for New Jersey, and $256 million for Connecticut. Ridgewood’s newspapers proposed their own plan, starting with an Erie Lackawanna–Penn Central interchange at Secaucus for direct entry into Penn Station.

The governors announced a program with $390 million on the New Jersey side: a PATH extension through Newark Airport to Plainfield, and Erie-Lackawanna connections to the Penn Central at Kearny and Secaucus for direct service to Penn Station. They agreed on legislation to repeal the 1962 covenant for future Port Authority bonds.

Tri-State authorized a $250,000 study of proposed faster rail service between Suffern and New York, sponsored by the MTA and funded two-thirds by the federal government. It would examine the Erie Lackawanna right-of-way, stations, parking and road access, with Rockland County and affected municipalities contributing to the review.

Governor Malcolm Wilson signed legislation repealing the covenant that barred the Authority from investing bondholder funds in “unprofitable” mass transit; New Jersey had already enacted it. A legal challenge by bondholders was expected. The repeal was said to open about $1 billion in bonding capacity for transit.

The Institute for Public Transportation proposed that the Tri-State Regional Planning Commission write a binding transportation master plan, with zoning review and power to withhold federal funds, and that an expanded Port Authority coordinate service across three states. “This would end the present practice of transit authorities writing their own plans,” its director said.

Tri-State released a five-year program for maintaining, operating and modestly expanding the region’s roads and public transportation, including $3 billion in North Jersey improvements. Chairman Raymond Schuler said it would guide federal transportation assistance while public comments were gathered, making inclusion in the plan a condition for receiving Washington’s funding.

Transportation commissioner Alan Sagner asked federal officials to approve a $749 million rail program led by the Newark–Plainfield PATH extension. New Jersey coupled that project with electrification on the Morris and Essex and North Jersey Coast routes, arguing that studies of a future operating authority should not hold up capital approvals.

Connecticut commissioners withdrew objections to the New Jersey–New York transportation improvement program after Tri-State agreed to study their air-pollution concerns through a special committee. The compromise allowed the regional rail and highway project list to proceed to federal officials rather than be tabled, exposing the tension between Connecticut’s stricter air-quality obligations and its neighbors’ transport investments.

A revised Tri-State development guide proposed concentrating growth in existing urban and suburban centers, conserving environmentally sensitive land and aligning homes with jobs and public services. Prepared to guide federal grant decisions, it sought to restrain scattered development while allowing housing needs to be considered alongside environmental constraints.

New York Secretary of State Mario Cuomo recommended that Governor Hugh Carey support a trial giving Nassau and Suffolk control of their local federal-aid reviews. His proposal preserved Tri-State review for projects affecting the wider metropolitan area and also backed a Long Island voting seat on the commission, offering a compromise after the governors had opposed outright separation.

Tri-State’s Public Policy Toward Aviation report argued that road access, rather than runway demand alone, would constrain the region’s major airports. It proposed expanding suburban airports and identified Stewart Airport in Newburgh as the main facility capable of relieving the larger airports across the full range of destinations.

A televised series asked how the region’s transportation should be managed. A columnist wrote that the Tri-State commission’s staff had “presided over the disasters” of unfinished projects “with nary a public whisper,” because it was “a planning commission with no responsibility to implement.”