Evidence for better transportation and land-use decisions.
I help civic groups and institutions evaluate proposals, test their assumptions, and make a clear, sourced case for change.
I produce policy analysis, public-records research, data tools, and visual comparisons for transportation and land-use decisions.
Middletown Town Commons / October 2025–June 2026
Give residents a way to compare what could be built.
I translated development plans and resident priorities into visual alternatives for a contested public site in Middletown, Rhode Island.
The decision
Middletown was pursuing mixed-use development on roughly 15 acres of town-owned land at West Main Road and Coddington Highway. Residents were contesting the development footprint and the future of Pottsy Field and the recreation complex.
My contribution
As an independent civic visualization contributor, I turned two-dimensional planning material into aerial views, then developed alternative concepts informed by residents’ priorities.
I worked on building placement, parking, and open space so those choices could be discussed together. Residents supplied local priorities; I produced and revised the visual material.
Translate the development concept
Explore a resident alternative
Concept illustrations from different stages and viewpoints; neither is an approved design. Open either image to inspect it.
The result: a comparison people could show.
This printed board pairs a hotel concept with resident alternatives and explicitly credits my resident concept.
It puts a concrete question in front of the viewer: how much of this public site should become buildings and parking, and how much should remain available for public use?
Inspect the presentation board
What happened to the proposal
The town’s April 2026 amended agreement narrowed the development to a hotel on the approximately 3.24-acre corner parcel, citing public comments. On July 14, 2026, the Town Council rejected the comprehensive-plan and zoning amendments, ending that version of the project.
I contributed the visual work to a wider resident effort. The amended agreement and the later vote were decisions of the town.
Penn Station / Rail capacity & public records / 2026
Test the capacity claim before fixing the station design.
I examine how operating assumptions, through-running, and platform choices shape the case for investment in Penn Station.
The decision
Which changes could carry more trains through Penn Station, and which future options must the station redesign preserve?
My contribution
I compared the Federal Railroad Administration’s Phase I report, FAQ, and expanded Phase II scope, then published a capacity analysis and Study Watch. I distinguish modeled service levels from an ultimate capacity limit and identify the operating assumptions and design evidence that need scrutiny.
What the comparison establishes
FRA modeled an increase from 24 peak-direction trans-Hudson trains per hour to as many as 32 in the morning and 30 in the evening. Phase II will test a higher maximum across the regional rail system.
My analysis asks which limits come from station geometry and which come from train arrivals, yard movements, or the service plan. Study Watch identifies the model results and design drawings needed to evaluate the next decisions.
The published result
The analysis and Study Watch give readers a source-linked account of the findings, unresolved tests, and design commitments. The federal modeling and study program belong to FRA; my contribution is independent analysis and public scrutiny of that record.
Use Study WatchOpen to everyone
Use the research.
Follow the documents behind the argument. These public resources connect transportation analysis to the studies, contracts, and records it draws on.
Liam Blank
I have worked on New York metropolitan transportation policy since 2014, including roles at ReThinkNYC, Tri-State Transportation Campaign, and PCAC to the MTA. I chair the City Club of New York’s Transportation & Infrastructure Committee.
I grew up in Rhode Island and live in New York City.
More about my experienceHave a public decision to work through?
I can help your group examine the records, test a proposal’s assumptions, and develop the analysis or visual material needed for a public meeting or institutional decision.
Send the decision you’re facing, the question you need answered, any relevant plans or records, and your deadline.
Discuss a project liam@liamblank.com