Skip to content
THE HISTORY OF DECISIONS NEW YORK · NEW JERSEY · CONNECTICUT

Follow the decisions that shaped a divided transportation region.

Regional transportation institutions took shape through agreements and disagreements over money, jurisdiction, representation and operating control. This chronology follows those decisions across New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, with links to the reporting and records behind them.

Begin with a historical conflict below, or use the complete timeline to trace events by date. The companion newspaper archive preserves the reports themselves. Event dates describe when something happened; publication dates describe when its sources appeared.

THREE PATHS INTO THE RECORD

Start with a consequential question.

Read the history, follow dated turning points, then examine the original evidence.

Dates refer to events; source citations include publication dates.

20 events

1957

1957

Consultant finds the Port Authority financially unable to take on transit

William Miller’s 135-page financing study for the commission found that the two states could legally authorize the Port Authority to undertake rail rapid transit, but that the Authority’s lack of taxing power and its self-supporting policy “deprive the Port Authority of competence to undertake such a project.” He recommended a Metropolitan Rapid Transit District.

Reported in

1958

January 27, 1958

Transit district bills introduced in Trenton and Albany

Senator Walter H. Jones introduced a bill to create a Metropolitan Transit District with a 32-member council, 16 from each state, and $150,000 a year from each state for five years. An identical bill was introduced in the New York Legislature the same day. Any plan would need approval from both Legislatures.

Reported in

April 24, 1958

Harriman signs New York’s transit district bill over Wagner’s objection

Governor Harriman approved New York’s participation in the bi-state district. Mayor Wagner, as chairman of the Metropolitan Regional Council, had urged more study. “I do not believe we should wait for another year,” Harriman said. The district still needed New Jersey’s approval and ratification by Congress.

Reported in

May 4, 1958

North Jersey municipal coalition urges a Port Authority rail role

The Joint Committee of Municipal Groups of Northern New Jersey publicly opposed creation of a separate transit authority. Counsel Augustus S. Dreier argued that the Port Authority’s existing revenues and coordinated control of rail and road facilities offered a way to sustain commuter service without new local taxation.

Reported in

October 24, 1958

Commission tells Meyner the bill commits no one to the loop

In a letter to the Governor and Legislature, the commission said the transit district act “does one thing only—it creates a public agency, based on local representation, to develop and to negotiate such a public plan.” The Herald News noted that Congress had since given the Interstate Commerce Commission jurisdiction over railroad passenger service, and the ICC was letting railroads curtail it.

Reported in

November 17, 1958

Rockefeller seeks a three-governor meeting on commuter transportation

Governor-elect Nelson A. Rockefeller said he would seek an early meeting with Governors Meyner and Ribicoff. “Something has got to be done about transit and transportation before the end of the year,” he said. Meyner said he would be “delighted” to join, and that he was willing to amend the district bill to meet objections.

Reported in

November 24, 1958

Six-hour Assembly hearing: Tobin says the Authority has “not one dime”

Port Authority executive director Austin J. Tobin argued for more than two hours that the Authority could not spend on transit and submitted a 46-page memorandum. The Assembly’s economist, Dr. Salomon J. Flink, countered in a 57-page report that the Authority could set aside earnings to cover part of a transit deficit. The commission’s co-chairmen asked for action; the Regional Council asked for a tri-state approach.

Reported in

1959

April 6, 1959

Plainfield asks Meyner to veto Port Authority projects until commuting is solved

The Plainfield Common Council voted unanimously for the resolution despite a letter from Tobin warning that involvement in the rail crisis “could well lead to the destruction of the Port Authority as a useful agent.” The sponsor answered that “the Port Authority was created to do this job.”

Reported in

1960

April 4, 1960

New Jersey proposes service contracts, rail consolidation and an H&M rescue

The Division of Railroad Transportation proposed $6 million a year in state service contracts, consolidation of Shore passenger service under the Pennsylvania Railroad, and rerouting Jersey Central trains through Newark. It asked the Port Authority to buy 90 H&M cars for $8.55 million and lease them to the railroad, while placing H&M under bi-state control. The report opposed handing the Port Authority New Jersey’s entire rail problem; longer-term proposals included extending rapid transit and integrating services.

Reported in

1962

1962

Port Authority takes the Hudson tubes, with a covenant against further rail deficits

The two states had the Port Authority take over the bankrupt Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, now PATH, alongside the World Trade Center. The statute included a covenant that further deficit financing of railroad projects would be undertaken only within set financial limits, which the Authority read as 10 percent of its General Reserve Fund.

Reported in

1963

May 9, 1963

Tri-State outlines park-and-ride, airport and West Shore demonstrations

In its third interim report, Tri-State described a $256,000 New Brunswick park-and-ride station, a proposed Manhattan–Idlewild rail-and-limousine connection, and a study of express buses on the West Shore railroad right-of-way. The busway proposal would preserve freight tracks and serve Bergen and Rockland passengers through local pickups and express running. The committee also outlined a major household and vehicle travel survey to support long-range planning.

Reported in

1965

1965

New York creates the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority

New York created the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority to take responsibility for the Long Island Rail Road and other commuter services. William J. Ronan, Governor Rockefeller’s secretary and chairman of the Tri-State committee, became its chairman. The authority purchased the LIRR from the Pennsylvania Railroad in early 1966, giving the state an operating body alongside the region’s planning commission.

Reported in

April 25, 1965

Tri-State calls for a coordinated system of 32 public airports

Tri-State recommended a regional network of 32 publicly owned airports for growing business and private aviation. The plan combined primary and secondary fields with Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark, and called for about $38 million in additional public investment. It proposed greater federal and state contributions while leaving county and municipal governments as airport owners, applying regional coordination to a transportation field beyond commuter rail.

Reported in

1967

January 3, 1967

Commuter authority to study a fourth jetport

William J. Ronan said the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority would study jetport sites at Governor Rockefeller’s request, citing Calverton in Suffolk County and planned 100-mile-per-hour Long Island Rail Road trains. Grumman, which leased the field, opposed its conversion.

Reported in

May 2, 1967

Rockefeller signs the law consolidating New York’s regional transit leadership

Governor Nelson Rockefeller signed legislation to expand the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation Authority into the Metropolitan Transportation Authority the following March. William Ronan would chair the larger board and, by virtue of that position, the city transit system and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority. The law brought rail, subway and toll facilities under common policy direction while retaining operating organizations and leaving the bi-state Port Authority outside the new structure.

Reported in

Reported September 14, 1967

Parsekian proposes a Meadowlands hub for a regional rail network

State Senator Ned Parsekian proposed a rail hub near East Rutherford with radial and circumferential routes serving North Jersey, Rockland, New York City and major airports. He called for a joint planning and financing task force and substantial federal and state support. His proposal emphasized trips between suburbs as well as commuting to Manhattan, arguing that a regional network should follow people’s destinations across state and municipal boundaries.

Reported in

1972

November 15, 1972

Cahill and Rockefeller announce $650 million in rail projects and repeal of the covenant

The governors announced a program with $390 million on the New Jersey side: a PATH extension through Newark Airport to Plainfield, and Erie-Lackawanna connections to the Penn Central at Kearny and Secaucus for direct service to Penn Station. They agreed on legislation to repeal the 1962 covenant for future Port Authority bonds.

Reported in

1975

May 5, 1975

Port Authority raises crossing tolls for a transit investment program

The Port Authority raised passenger-car bridge and tunnel tolls by 50 cents, projecting $36.6 million in additional annual revenue. It said the money would support airport rail links, direct Manhattan access for Erie Lackawanna trains and expansion of the Manhattan bus terminal, while Morris County officials demanded a fuller public explanation of the increases.

Reported in

1978

Reported November 26, 1978

Tri-State identifies Stewart as a regional airport-relief option

Tri-State’s Public Policy Toward Aviation report argued that road access, rather than runway demand alone, would constrain the region’s major airports. It proposed expanding suburban airports and identified Stewart Airport in Newburgh as the main facility capable of relieving the larger airports across the full range of destinations.

Reported in

1996

February 13, 1996

Regional Plan Association proposes replacing the Port Authority and the MTA

The association’s 25-year plan called for folding the two agencies into a Regional Transportation Authority for New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, and for $25 billion in new rail lines. The Giuliani administration “expressed scant enthusiasm”; Port Authority executives said “melding them together will prove difficult.”

Reported in

All 20 events loaded.

Newspaper archive