Through-Running Case
The technical and operating case for converting Penn Station from a fragmented terminal into a modern, high-capacity regional rail hub.
Read the proposalThe region faces a generational decision: demolish a city block to build a massive terminal extension, or modernize train operations to unlock capacity within the existing footprint.
The core unresolved question: The agencies claim through-running is impossible without demolition. However, newly released public records and internal documents reveal the operational models used to justify this claim are heavily disputed, missing, or contradictory.
The agencies' justification for a multi-billion-dollar station expansion rests on the October 2024 feasibility study, which claims capacity cannot be met through operational efficiencies. However, the foundational modeling proving this claim has never been published.
This creates a glaring contradiction in the public record. In official FOIA responses, Amtrak stated "no simulations were performed" to justify the study. Yet, newly uncovered internal emails show the FRA requesting access to a specific "Penn Station-specific RTC model."
Until the underlying rail traffic models, assumptions, and internal agency disputes are released to the public, the official claim that Penn Station must be expanded via demolition remains technically unverified.
"We have discovered significant deficiencies in both the modeling assumptions and the resulting analysis... which directly impacts the claimed Train Per Hour (TPH) capacity."
— Internal NJ TRANSIT memo objecting to federal capacity models (Released April 2026 via OPRA)
Explore the affirmative case for through-running, read the public records, or find tools to take action before the decision window closes.
The technical and operating case for converting Penn Station from a fragmented terminal into a modern, high-capacity regional rail hub.
Read the proposalThe paper trail holding the agencies accountable: Amtrak FOIA materials, state OPRA releases, consulting contracts, and internal emails.
View the documentsOur complete technical critique addressing the flawed methodology in the RPA's April 2026 report on through-running.
Read the rebuttalScripts, contact lists, and social assets for advocates and residents demanding transparency before demolition begins.
Open the toolkit