Uniting Suburbs, One Rail Project at a Time
Summary
Ken Belson describes proposed direct New Haven–Meadowlands service and the institutional work needed to connect regional railroads, including operating crews, liability and ticket revenues.
Transcription
After many stops and starts, the area’s major commuter railroads are finally trying to make it
easier for people to get from Connecticut to New Jersey.
That is if you are a Giants or a Jets fan.
By the fall of 2009, rail officials hope to run Metro-North trains from New Haven to
Pennsylvania Station and then on to Secaucus Junction, where Giants and Jets fans can
switch trains and ride one stop to a new station being built in the Meadowlands on a 1.9-
mile-long rail spur now under construction. The project is estimated to cost $190 million.
The game-day trains, which have been in the works for several months, have received
crucial backing from the governors of Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, who, like rail
officials and train advocates, see them as the first of many efforts to breach Manhattan’s
geographical divide, uniting suburbs around the area.
“Our hope is that you would eventually have a more regional rail network,” said William M.
Wheeler, the director of special project development and planning at the Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, which oversees the Metro-North and the Long Island railroads.
“You’re seeing systems getting to the point where larger opportunities can now be
explored.”
The efforts were jump-started earlier this year by Elliot G. Sander, chief executive of the
authority, and his counterparts at New Jersey Transit. They have also received the blessing
of New Jersey’s governor, Jon S. Corzine, a big proponent of plans to build a second train
tunnel under the Hudson River.
Not to be outdone, Gov. M. Jodi Rell of Connecticut in June called for direct rail service to
Penn Station for Metro-North trains on the New Haven Line, and instructed the state’sDepartment of Transportation to look at “every available option” to provide service to the
West Side of Manhattan.
Later this year, Metro-North is expected to file a draft environmental impact statement with
the Federal Transit Administration, outlining its plans for commuter service from
Connecticut to Penn Station. The plan, however, does not include a proposal, which has
been discussed for years, that would link Grand Central Terminal to Penn Station. That
project, which would have given commuters easier access to both stations, has been
shelved for now.
Planners also hope to run trains from Trenton to New Haven and from Poughkeepsie to
Penn Station and then on to Long Island. New service to Yankee Stadium and expanded
service to Shea Stadium are other possibilities, as well as the development of stations in the
South Bronx and Co-op City in the Bronx. Many of these ideas will have to wait until
capacity in and out of Penn Station is expanded in the next decade.
Coordinating trains from Connecticut to the Meadowlands, which are expected to run only
on weekends during the football season, may not sound like sending men to the moon. But
given the deep institutional fissures that have long separated Amtrak, the L.I.R.R., MetroNorth and New Jersey Transit, it might as well be hailed as such.
The routes are not much of a problem. Amtrak already runs trains from Boston to New
Haven, through Penn Station and Secaucus on their way to Philadelphia. But the railroads
will need to use New Jersey Transit electric locomotives with coaches that could come from
Metro-North.
Metro-North, New Jersey Transit and Amtrak must work out how to deploy their crews,
particularly if they operate outside their normal territory. The railroads must figure out who
will be liable if trains or other property are damaged.
Tickets are expected to cost the equivalent of the fare of riding from Connecticut to Grand
Central Terminal plus the price of a New Jersey Transit ticket from Penn Station to the
Meadowlands. But fare collection and revenue sharing need to be determined. Like nearly
all public transportation, some portion of the service will be subsidized.
Scheduling is an issue, too. The New Jersey Transit trains that run to Connecticut on
Sundays will need to return to the yard, to be serviced and in place for the Monday morning
rush. That means service is possible only for day games. Amtrak must also grant
permission to use its platforms and tracks leading in and out of Penn Station, which is
already very crowded.
The agencies are confident they can work out the logistics and finances. Since all the
planners and engineers are in-house, the costs of setting up the service are minimal.But the project has taken up many man-hours, which has some riders and rail advocates
wondering why so much effort is being spent on shuttling football fans to games when
passengers are forced to stand during the busiest times of the work day and have trouble
finding parking at stations.
They also say that the railroads are not thinking broadly enough about regional train
transport. In several years, L.I.R.R. riders will have one-train access to the East Side of
Manhattan, while New Jersey Transit is building a second commuter rail tunnel under the
Hudson River that will increase capacity to the West Side.
But both of those efforts will include the construction of new stations that will require long
walks to Grand Central Terminal and Penn Station to make connections. And the new
stations will not connect the East and West Sides of Manhattan, as was originally
envisioned.
The second tunnel “has devolved into a project with lofty goals into a six-track addition to
Penn Station,” said Albert L. Papp Jr., of the New Jersey Association of Railroad
Passengers. “It’s nothing more than the trans- Hudson tunnel for riders from New Jersey,
but nothing else.”
Railroad officials say these huge projects will add extra capacity that will ultimately increase
access for riders. And the railroads are trying to keep up to meet emerging demand by
reverse commuters and others. By running trains in new directions during slower travel
periods, the railroads will also make better use of their resources.
“We are very much engaged in addressing the journey to work for most people, but there
are other needs,” said Richard T. Roberts, chief planner for New Jersey Transit. “There are a
lot of other things that people travel for, and if you have these huge assets, you can use it at
different times of the day.”
Related Content
Editors’ Picks